Which represents the element of foreign policy strategy least likely to be employed by the doctrines of all three presidents, bush, clinton, and bush?

The element of foreign policy strategy least likely to be employed by the doctrines of all three presidents, Bush, Clinton and Bush would be the element of idealism.

Explanation:

In International Relations the term "Idealism" is often used to define the approach to a specific foreign policy strategy based on a philosophical or moral perspective.

While Presidents Bush and Clinton did mention the moral values of the American people in relation to the foreign policies their governments were applying at the time, it is clear that neither of them based the international policy agenda on a philosophical viewpoint, rather they based it on the interests of the country and the position of power it holds in comparison to most other nations in the world.

The element of foreign policy strategy which least likely represents to be employed by the doctrines of all three presidents, Bush, Clinton, and Bush is Idealism. Idealism used to define approaches to foreign policy strategies that are specifically based on philosophical or moral perspectives.

EXPLANATION  

In International Relations there is the term "Idealism" which is often used to define approaches to foreign policy strategies that are specifically based on philosophical or moral perspectives.

For example, an idealist would believe that the way to end poverty in their country must be accompanied by handling poverty abroad. The originator of idealism is president A. Woodrow Wilson. Wilson's idealism was the beginning of the theory of liberal international relations, which would later emerge in the "institutional development" of World War II.

President Bush and Clinton often mention the moral values of the American people in matters relating to foreign policy that will be applied by the government at that time. It can be seen that they all base the international policy agenda not from a philosophical point of view, instead they base it on the agenda of the interests of the state and the position of power it has compared to that of most other countries.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

•The foreign policy of the 1970s was ruled by the policy of

KEYWORD: idealism, Bush, Clinton.

Subject: History

Class: college

Subchapter: Foreign Policy

citizens united v. federal election commission, case in which the u.s. supreme court on january 21, 2010, ruled (5–4) that laws that prevented corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds for independent “electioneering communications” (political advertising) violated the first amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. in so doing the court invalidated section 203 of the federal bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra)—also known as the mccain-feingold act for its sponsors, sen. john mccain and sen. russ feingold—as well as section 441(b) of the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), which the bcra had amended. the court also overturned in whole or in part two previous supreme court rulings: austin v. michigan chamber of commerce (1990) and mcconnell v. federal election commission (2003).

immediately perceived as historically important, the decision generated intense controversy outside the court. some hailed it as a resounding victory for freedom of speech, while others criticized it as an overreaching attempt to rewrite campaign finance law. among the critics was pres. barack obama, who remarked in his state of the union address in the house of representatives one week later that the decision would “open the floodgates for special interests…to spend without limit in our elections.” his criticism provoked one of the supreme court justices in attendance, samuel a. alito, to break decorum by mouthing the words “not true.”

explanation:

i think it should be slowed colonial western march